Health Care Journals | Open Access - Edelweiss | Edelweiss Publications

Neurophysiology and Rehabilitation (ISSN: 2641-8991)

Review Article

Role of Dynein and Dynactin (DCTN-1) in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Rajib Dutta and Swatilekha Roy Sarkar

DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.33805/2641-8991.123

PDF

Published on January, 2020


Abstract

The pathophysiology and concept of degeneration in central nervous system is very complex and overwhelming at times. There is a complex mechanism which exists among different molecules in the cytoplasm of cell bodies of neurons, antegrade and retrograde axonal transport of cargoes and accumulation of certain substances and proteins which can influence the excitatory neurotransmitter like glutamate initiating the process of neurodegeneration. Neurons have extensive processes and communication between those processes and the cell body is crucial to neuronal function, viability and survival over time with progression of age. Researchers believe neurons are uniquely dependent on microtubule-based cargo transport. There is enough evidence to support that deficits in retrograde axonal transport contribute to pathogenesis in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. Cytoplasmic dynein and its regulation by Dynactin (DCTN1) is the major molecular motor cargo involved in autophagy, mitosis and neuronal cell survival. Mutation in dynactin gene located in 2p13.1,is indeed studied very extensively and is considered to be involved directly or indirectly to various conditions like Perry syndrome, familial and sporadic Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Hereditary spastic paraplegia, Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA-5), Huntingtons disease, Alzheimers disease, Charcot marie tooth disease, Hereditary motor neuropathy 7B, prion disease, parkinsons disease, malformation of cortical development, polymicrogyria to name a few with exception of Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

Introduction

Neurodegenerative Diseases (NDDs) come under certain group of pathological entity characterized by the degeneration of a subset of neurons. Once the degeneration process starts it either remains localized or spread to different parts of brain resulting in less or no communication among neurons. This degenerative phenotype covers several distinct events that include disappearance in dendritic compartments, cell bodies or axonal shrinking and over time decreasing communication across the nerve cells. Role of excitatory neurotransmitters like glutamate should also be considered in the whole process. NDDs include pathologies such as AD, PD, HD, MND, HSP and SCA etc. It can either inherit or appear sporadically in non-previously affected families and generations. The socio-economic burden is strongly increasing worldwide with time, mostly because of its association with aging, the current increase in lifespan thus mechanically leading to increased frequencies of NDDs in the geriatric population.

The end point to all NDDs is the occurrence of neuronal degeneration accumulating over time. Symptoms of a number of NDDs are caused by loss of synaptic connections rather than loss of neuronal cell bodies themselves [1]. Different symptoms in different NDDs affecting different age group and ethnicity are caused by either nature or localization of the affected neurons i.e., degeneration might be widespread and very severe like in prion diseases or affect only a small neuronal population in a given location like basal ganglia dopaminergic neurons in PD or front temporal lobe in Front Temporal Dementia (FTD).

This initial nerve cell selectivity however remains relative during the starting of disease process and nothing can be said why one location of the brain more affected as compared to other parts. However it is seen in previous literatures that degeneration involves a number of other cell types and not a single cell type [2]. Common semiology exists between different NDDs. Commonest histopathological feature of NDDs is the presence of protein aggregates [3]. These aggregates might be intracellular or extracellular. The core biochemical composition of protein aggregates guides the pathogenic mechanism involved in NDD [4,5]. Secondly neuronal degeneration is due to events both intrinsic and extrinsic to neurons and thirdly impairment of retrograde axonal transport. Exchange of cargoes between the axonal tip and neuronal cell body is called axonal transport. Role of cytoskeletal structures is very important when we consider transport across neurons either towards the plus or minus end.

Long distance transport is carried out on microtubules, while short distance is mediated by actin. Microtubules constitute the cytoskeletal tracks on which molecular motors are able to carry cargoes from the cell body to the synapse (anterograde axonal transport) or from the synapse to the cell body (retrograde axonal transport). Anterograde axonal transport is carried out by kinesin like motors, while retrograde axonal transport is performed mostly by a single motor, cytoplasmic dynein. There seems to be a race between kinesin and dynein as cargoes move opposite to each other.

Most of the studies have demonstrated that axonal transport machinery is impaired during the process of neurodegeneration. Stress induced (CDK5) Cyclin Dependent Kinase-5 activation disrupts axonal transport via Lis1/Ndel1/Dynein [6-8]. In this article, we will focus on one major cytoskeletal motor proteindynein, its structure, regulation and dysregulation which can lead to different types of NDDs. We will also discuss its role in retrograde axonal transport and as the molecular motor responsible for transport of misfolded proteins for their degradation and its clearance from cytoplasm.

Cytoplasmic Dynein

Structure
Cytoplasmic dynein is the most complex mammalian cytoskeletal motor protein. Dynein motors are very different in their structures, localizations and functions [9,10]. There are two molecular complexes called cytoplasmic dynein (CD1 and CD2). CD2 is mostly present in ciliated cells and is involved in intraflagellar transport in lower eukaryotes [11,12]. However, King a et al recently reported mutations in (CD2) complex which causes Short-Rib Thoracic Dystrophy Syndromes (SRTDs), characterized by impaired bone growth and life-threatening perinatal respiratory complications [13]. CD1 (dynein in this article) is expressed in most tissues, including brain, testis, lung, liver and kidney [14]. Dynein as a molecular motor is capable of moving cargo towards the minus-end of the microtubules i.e. from the periphery to the cell center, thus, they are called minus-end directed motors. Dynein, at first named as MAP1C, was discovered in 1987 [15] and was initially identified as a component of microtubule preparations. Dynein was shown to possess ATP-hydrolyzing activity and microtubule translocation properties and to be able to produce force in a direction opposite to that observed for kinesin-1, suggesting that it constituted a retrograde motor [16,17]. However, literature has also reported ability of dynein to move cargoes using variable step sizes, but also lateral steps and processive runs toward both the minus- and plus-end of the microtubule surface [18,19].

Recently Ping Xie reported about the force dependence of the number of ATPmolecules consumed per mechanical step, indicating that under no or low force the motors exhibit a tight chemo mechanical coupling and as the force increases the number of ATPs consumed per step increases greatly [20]. Cytoplasmic dynein is a large and complex molecule. Core of the enzyme consists of a dimer of two heavy chains (DYNC1H1) [21] each of which folds to form a motor domain composed of six AAA motifs, followed by a less well-characterized 7th domain, yielding a donut-shaped head with 7 distinct subdomains [22].These heads are the sites of ATP binding and force production, the microtubule binding site localizes to a stalk that projects from the head domain [23]. Mg2+-free ATP regulates the processivity of native cytoplasmic dynein [24]. The N-terminal domain of the dynein heavy chain forms an extended stem, which dimerizes to form a two-headed molecule. These polypeptides are thought to function primarily in cargo association and regulation. Apart from the two heavy chains of 530 kD [25,26] that constitute the motors themselves, dynein is a multi- complex protein composed of a number of noncatalytic subunits, notably two intermediate chains of 74 kD and four light intermediate chains of 55 kD and a number of less characterized light chains such as LC8, Tctex1 or Rp3[27,28].

The tail domain of dynein heavy chain interacts with intermediate light and light chains to form the cargo-binding complex. A key assembly factor specifically required for the stability of axonal dynein heavy chains in cytoplasm is WDR92 and suggests that cytoplasmic/IFT dynein heavy chains use a distinct folding pathway [29]. The accessory proteins of the dynein complex are probably crucial in the cargo association, regulation selectivity of the motor [30]. Dynein light chain binding determines complex formation and posttranslational stability of the Bcl-2 family members BMF and BIM apoptotic activity [31]. Regulated associations of dynein with cargo may be mediated by rab proteins. Rabs are an extensive family of small GTPases that associate with specific membrane compartments in the cell [32]. Activated rab 6 recruits dynein to TGN derived vesicles via the proteins BICD or BICD2 [33], while rab7 and RILPLIP recruit dynein to lysosomes [34]. Thus, rab induced recruitment could provide specific and regulatable interactions between motor and cargo for a broad range of cellular transport functions. Activating adaptors such as BICD2 and Hook1 enhance the stability of the complex that dynein forms with its required activator dynactin, leading to highly processive motility toward the microtubule minus end. Furthermore, activating adaptors mediate specific interactions of the motor complex with cargos such as Rab6-positive vesicles or rib nucleoprotein particles for BICD2 and signaling endosomes for Hook1 [35].

Puja Goyal and colleagues reported the role of coiled-coil rRegistry shifts in the activation of human bicaudal D2 for dynein recruitment upon cargo binding. Recent report suggested three structural elements protruding from the motor domain-the linker, buttress, and stalk-together regulates directional tension-sensing. Dyneins anisotropic response to directional tension is mediated by sliding of the coiled-coils of the stalk, and that coordinated conformational changes of dyneins linker and buttress control this process [36]. The authors also demonstrated that the stalk coiled-coils assume a previously undescribed registry during dyneins stepping cycle [37] .The role of the stalk in regulating motor activity and coupling conformational changes across the two halves of the AAA ring is also reported by Stefan Niekamp and colleagues [38].

Regulation
Dynein is associated with dynactin [39,40] another multi-protein complex with ten subunits including p150Glued, p135Glued, p62, p50 (dynamitin) and Arp1 [41]. Interaction of dynein and dynactin is through dynein intermediate chain and p150Glued [42]. Particularly the Arp1 subunit of dynactin binds to β-III spectrin a filamentous protein that is found on the cytosolic side of a number of intracellular vesicles [43]. DCTN1 is known to increase dynein processivity [44]. Dynein activity is modulated by a number of ubiquitous cofactors such as UNC-83 [45], LIS1-Ndel1-Nde1 and Bicaudal-D [46,47].

Dynein has been shown to interact with huntingtin and huntingtin-associated protein 1 [48] and Act mediated phosphorylation of huntingtin is able to promote anterograde transport through kinesin-1 recruitment, while dephosphorylating of huntingtin stimulates dynein dependent retrograde transport [49]. Two cyclin dependent kinases, CDK-5 and PCT-1 and the cyclin CCY-1 [50] have been shown to negatively regulate dynein in nematode model and the JNK kinase pathway might also be involved in the regulation of dynein [51]. Simon Bullock, et al., reported egalitarian as a selective RNA-binding protein, linking mRNA localization signals to the dynein motor and molecular strategies that are likely to be of general relevance for cargo transport by dynein [52]. Recent report suggested KIF1C and dynein/dynactin can exist in a complex scaffold by Hook3. Full-length Hook3 binds to and activates dynein/dynactin motility and may regulate bidirectional motility, promote motor recycling, or sequester the pool of available dynein/dynactin activating adaptors [53]. Sanchez et al demonstrated mechanistic insight into the polarization of cytoskeletal regulators and close coordination between microtubule and F-actin architecture at the Immunological Synapse (IS) [54].

 Function
Dynein has a large variety of functions and is involved in a number of different cell processes. The most well documented function is the minus end-directed transport of membranous organelles [55]. In neurons, dynein is responsible for retrograde axonal transport [56]. Dynein is able to transport a large variety of cargoes such as mitochondria, proteins (neurofilaments, trophic factors like brain-derived neurotropic factor, RNA particles) [57]. Dynein also participates in endoplasmic reticulum membrane tubules organization [58], is required in vitro for the formation of endoplasmic reticulum networks [59], and for the centrosomal localization of the Golgi complex [60].

Dynein maintains the microtubule networks [61] and is involved in the lysomal trafficking [62], and in the vesicular transport from early to late endosomes [63]. Dynein is also involved in the clearance of protein aggregates since mutation in dynein impairs their autophagic clearance [64]. Dynein is required for mitosis since it was found on kinetochores [65], and drives them to the spindle poles [66,67]. Dynein is also able to drive lipid droplets [68] participates indirectly in their formation [69] and breakdown [70]. Richard B. Vallee and colleagues reported LIC1, through BicD2, is required for apical nuclear migration in neural progenitors.

In newborn neurons, specific roles exist for LIC1 in the multipolar to bipolar transition and glial-guided neuronal migration. In contrast, LIC2 contributes to a novel dynein role in the little-studied mode of migration which is known as terminal somal translocation. Together, they provided a novel insight into the LICs unique functions during brain development and dynein regulation overall [71]. Regulation of in vivo dynein force production by CDK5 and 14-3-3ε and KIAA0528 dynein force adaptation can control the severity of lysosomal tug-of-wars among other intracellular transport functions involving high force [72].

 Dysfunction

Numbers of dynein functions have been, directly or indirectly, linked with NDDs.

·          Dysfunction in dynein transport was long associated with decreased retrograde axonal transport [73].

·          Synaptogenesis and synaptic maintenance are largely driven by retrograde messengers [74].

·          Neurotrophin retrograde signaling is completely dependent upon the formation of signaling endosomes carried to the cell body by dynein [75].

·          Axonal injury activates a number of signaling events that lead to transport signal to the nucleus through dynein dependent processes [76,77].

·          Dynein is critically involved in intracellular membranes trafficking it is required for endosomal and lysosomal transport [18,78]. Both dynein and endosomal transport are required for dendritic morphogenesis [79-81]. Dendritic morphogenesis is thought to be linked to dynein role in retrograde movement of neurofilaments [82].

·          Disruption of endosomal trafficking might lead to abnormal autophagic vesicle trafficking [64,83]. For example, cholesterol sensing in cells requires endosomal trafficking and is dynein dependent [84,85].

·          Dynein interacts with HDAC6 and this is required for the formation of aggresome a subcellular structure located at the microtubule organizing center and required for misfolded protein clearance [86,87].

 Dynein dysfunction is generally considered as a pathogenic event in post-mitotic neurons. However, dynein is also crucial for mitosis and through its function in mitotic spindle orientation dynein appears critically involved in neurogenesis [88,89]. Impairment of dynein function at adult age might thus also decrease neurogenesis and have an impact on cognition. On contrary, motor neurons in zebra fish embryos and larvae depleted for dynactin 1a point toward a local role for this protein in stabilizing the neuromuscular synapses, impairing its function, without leading to motor neuron death, novel role for dynactin1 in ALS pathogenesis, where it acts cell-autonomously to promote motor neuron synapse stability independently of dynein-mediated axonal transport [90]. Immunolocalization of dynein, dynactin, and kinesin was seen in the cerebral tissue in traumatic brain injury in postmortem examination [91].

Discussion

Dynactin and bicaudal D regulate not only the function of dynein but also of kinesins [92,93]. In a similar way huntingtin modulates the activity of dynein and kinesin and also have transcriptional effects on BDNF expression and PGC1α co-activator function [94,95]. Besides regulation of intracellular transport, p150 Glued protein has been shown to act as a docking protein and has been recently suggested to affect gene transcription through direct modulation of transcription factors [96,97]. In this respect, it is striking to note that dynein heterozygous mice appeared grossly normal while a point mutation on a single dynein heavy chain allele is sufficient to lead to a number of neurologic and peripheral phenotypes suggesting that the mutant allele possess a toxic gain of function over at least one crucial function for dynein in neuronal physiology [98]. Here again, genetic deletion of dynein in neurons of interest might show the dose dependency of neuronal survival to dynein motor activity.

Matthew G Marzo and colleagues recently established yeast as a medium-throughput model system that can be used to assess the molecular basis for dysfunction of disease-correlated dynein mutants [99]. Since the discovery of dynein, almost 25 years ago, studies has mostly demonstrated that this molecular motor might play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. Indeed, a number of cellular processes in our body are almost entirely dynein-dependent. Moreover a number of dynein interactors or regulators are mutant in various neurodegenerative diseases, clearly showing that the motor activity of dynein is certainly critical for neuronal survival. Direct proofs of involvement of dynein motor itself in NDDs are largely lacking. This lack of evidence might well be due to the obligate need of dynein for embryonic development. It remains unknown whether the motor activity of dynein is rate-limiting in neuronal survival or whether it is rather the quality of the material transported that bears any importance.

Conclusion

Dynein as a cytoskeletal molecular motor plays a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. Indeed, a number of cellular processes are dependent on dynein-dynactin motor complex like retrograde axonal transport of neurotrophic factors, injury signaling, misfolded protein degradation, endosomal and lysosomal trafficking. Lot of published studies has evidence about role of dynein, however, currently we have only indirect evidence, mostly based on dynamitin overexpression or on overexpression of mutant P150 Glued or other mutant interactors of dynein.MS which is a degenerative process was not associated with dynactin gene mutation. So, more studies are required at molecular level to understand the complexity of molecular motor pathomechanisms and interactions involved in degeneration of neurons.

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to my supervisor Professor Dr. Huifang Shang who gave initial ideas and supported me through this research study. I would also like to thank Dr. Swatilekha Roy Sarkar for her valuable feedback on the manuscript and literature screening from PubMed.

Search strategy

We identified relevant full articles in English by searching PubMed with no language restrictions for articles published till October, 2019 and reference lists from relevant articles. We used the search terms: dynein, dynactin, DCTN1, neurodegeneration, for this article. We included only references published related to the topic plus few hand searched articles from other databases as accepted manuscripts. The final reference list was made on the basis of relevance to the theme of this review.

References

 1.      Van Spronsen M and Hoogenrªd CC. Synapse pathology in psychiatric and neurologic disease (2010) Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 10: 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0104-8

2.      Dupuis L and Echaniz-Laguna A. Skeletal muscle in motor neuron diseases: therapeutic target and delivery route for potential treatments (2010) Curr Drug Targets 11: 1250-1261. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450111007011250

3.      Cuervo AM, Wong ES and Martinez-Vicente M. Protein degradation, aggregation, and misfolding (2010) Mov Disord 25: S49-S54. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22718

4.      Kabashi E, Valdmanis PN, Dion P, Spiegelman D, Velde CV, et al. TARDBP mutations in individuals with sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (2008) Nat Genet 40: 572-574. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.132

5.      Crews L and Masliah E. Molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Alzheimers disease (2010) Hum Mol Genet 19: R12-R20. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq160

6.      Ilieva H, Polymenidou M and Cleveland DW. Non-cell autonomous toxicity in neurodegenerative disorders: ALS and beyond (2009) J Cell Biol 187: 761-772. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200908164

7.      7.Morfini GA, Burns M, Binder LI, Kanaan NM, LaPointe N, et al. Axonal transport defects in neurodegenerative diseases (2009) J Neurosci 29: 12776-12786. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3463-09.2009

8.      Klinman E and Holzbaur ELF. Stress-Induced CDK5 Activation Disrupts Axonal Transport via Lis1/Ndel1/Dynein (2015) Cell Reports 12:462-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.032

9.      Pfister KK, Fisher EM, Gibbons IR, Hays TS, Holzbaur EL, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein nomenclature. J Cell Biol 171, 411-413.

10.   Pfister KK, Shah PR, Hummerich H, Russ A, Cotton J, et al. Genetic analysis of the cytoplasmic dynein subunit families (2005) PLoS Genet 2: e1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020001

11.   Porter ME, Bower R, Knott JA, Byrd P and Dentler W. Cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain 1b is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas (1999) Mol Biol Cell 10: 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.3.693

12.   Mikami A, Tynan SH, Hama T, Luby-Phelps K, Saito T, et al. Molecular structure of cytoplasmic dynein 2 and its distribution in neuronal and ciliated cells (2002) J Cell Sci 115: 4801-4808. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00168

13.   King A, Hoch NC, McGregor NE, Sims NA, Smyth IM, et al. Dynll1 is essential for development and promotes endochondral bone formation by regulating intraflagellar Dynein function in primary cilia (2019) Hum Mol Genet 28: 2573-2588. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddz083

14.   Yoshida T, Takanari H and Izutsu K. Distribution of cytoplasmic and axonemal dyneins in rat tissues (1992) J Cell Sci 101: 579-587.

15.   Paschal BM, Shpetner HS and Vallee RB. MAP1C is a microtubule-activated ATPase which translocates microtubules in vitro and has dynein-like properties (1987) J Cell Biol 105: 1273-1282. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.105.3.1273

16.   Paschal BM and Vallee RB. Retrograde transport by the microtubule associated protein MAP 1(1987) C Nature 330: 181183.https://doi.org/10.1038/330181a0

17.   Levy JR and Holzbaur EL. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin function and dysfunction in motor neurons (2006) Int J Dev Neurosci 24:103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2005.11.013

18.   Mallik R and Gross SP. Molecular motors: strategies to get along (2004) Curr Biol 14: R971-R982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2005.11.013

19.   Ross JL, Wallace K, Shuman H, Goldman YE and Holzbaur EL. Processive bidirectional motion of dynein-dynactin complexes in vitro (2006) Nat Cell Biol 8: 562-570. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1421

20.   Xie P. A model for the chemomechanical coupling of the mammalian cytoplasmic dynein molecular motor (2019) Europ Biophy J 48: 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-019-01386-z

21.   Pfister KK, Fisher EM, Gibbons IR, Hays TS, Holzbaur EL, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein nomenclature (2005) J Cell Biol 171: 411-413. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200508078

22.   Samso M and Koonce MP. 25 Angstrom resolution structure of a cytoplasmic dynein motor reveals a seven-member planar ring (2004) J Mol Biol 340:1059-1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.063

23.   Gee MA, Heuser JE and Vallee RB. An extended microtubule-binding structure within the dynein motor domain (1997) Nature 390: 636-639. https://doi.org/10.1038/37663

24.   Scholz T, Steffen W, Behrens VA, Walter WJ, Peters C, et al. Mg2+-free ATP regulates the processivity of native cytoplasmic dynein (2018) Febs letters 593: 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13319

25.   Paschal BM, Shpetner HS and Vallee RB. MAP1C is a microtubule-activated ATPase which translocates microtubules in vitro and has dynein-like properties (1987) J Cell Biol 105: 1273-1282. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.105.3.1273

26.   Holzbaur EL and Vallee RB. DYNEINS: molecular structure and cellular function (1994) Annu Rev Cell Biol 10: 339-372. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.105.3.1273

27.   King SM, Barbarese E, Dillman JF, Benashski SE, Do KT, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein contains a family of differentially expressed light chains (1998) Biochem 37: 15033-15041. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9810813

28.   Hirokawa N, Niwa S and Tanaka Y. Molecular motors in neurons: transport mechanisms and roles in brain function, development, and disease (2010) Neuron 68: 610-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.039

29.   Patel-King RS, Sakato-Antonku M, Yankova M and King SM. WDR92 is required for axonemal dynein heavy chain stability in cytoplasm (2018) MBoC 30: 1781-1877. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-03-0139

30.   Kardon JR and Vale RD. Regulators of the cytoplasmic dynein motor (2009) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 854-865. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2804

31.   Häcker G, Singh PK, Roukounakis A, Weber A, Das KK, et al. Dynein light chain binding determines complex formation and posttranslational stability of the Bcl-2 family members Bmf and Bim (2019) Cell Death and Diff. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-019-0365-y

32.   Deneka M, Neeft M and Sluijs P. Regulation of membrane transport by rab GTPases (2003) Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 38: 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/713609214

33.   Matanis T, Akhmanova A, Wulf P, Nery ED, Weide T, et al. Hoogenraad,Bicaudal-D regulates COPI-independent Golgi-ER transport by recruiting the dynein-dynactin motor complex (2002) Nat Cell Biol 4: 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.48.28806

34.   Jordens I, Fernandez-Borja M, Marsman M, Dusseljee S, Janssen L, et al. The Rab7 effector protein RILP controls lysosomal transport by inducing the recruitment of dynein-dynactin motors (2001) Curr Biol 11: 1680-1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00531-0

35.   Holzbaur ELF, Dominguez R and Olenick MA. Dynein activator Hook1 is required for trafficking of BDNF-signaling endosomes in neurons (2018) J Cell Biol 218: 220-233. http://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201805016

36.   Puja G, Solmaz SR, Neoll RC, Loh YJ, Debler EW, et al. Role of Coiled-Coil Registry Shifts in the Activation of Human Bicaudal D2 for Dynein Recruitment upon Cargo Binding (2019) J Phys Chem Lett 10: 4362-4367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01865

37.   Gennerich A, Nicholas PM, Berger F and Rao L. Molecular mechanism of cytoplasmic dynein tension sensing (2019) Nat Commu 10: 3332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11231-8

38.   Niekamp S, Coudray N, Zhang N, Vale RD and Bhabha G. Coupling of ATPase activity, microtubule binding,and mechanics in the dynein motor domain (2018) The EMBO Journal 38: e101414 https://doi.org/10.1101/309179

39.   Karki S and Holzbaur EL. Affinity chromatography demonstrates a direct binding between cytoplasmic dynein and the dynactin complex (1995) J Biol Chem 270:28806-28811. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.48.28806

40.   Vaughan KT and Vallee RB. Cytoplasmic dynein binds dynactin through a direct interaction between the intermediate chains and p150Glued (1995) J Cell Biol 131:1507-1516. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.131.6.1507

41.   Schroer TA. Dynactin (2004) Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20: 759-779.

42.   Vaughan KT. Microtubule plus ends, motors, and traffic of Golgi membranes (2005) Biochim Biophys Acta 1744: 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.05.001

43.   Holleran EA, Ligon LA, Tokito M, Stankewich MC, Morrow JS, et al. Beta III spectrin binds to the Arp1 subunit of dynactin (2001) J Biol Chem 276: 36598-36605. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m104838200

44.   King SJ and Schroer TA. Dynactin increases the processivity of the cytoplasmic dynein motor (2000) Nat Cell Biol 2: 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1038/71338

45.   Fridolfsson HN, Ly N, Meyerzon M and Starr DA. UNC-83 coordinates kinesin-1 and dynein activities at the nuclear envelope during nuclear migration (2010) Dev Biol 338: 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.12.004

46.   Dienstbier M and Li X. Bicaudal-D and its role in cargo sorting by microtubule based motors (2009) Biochem Soc Trans 37: 1066-1071. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0371066

47.   Kardon J R and Vale RD. Regulators of the cytoplasmic dynein motor (2009) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 854-865. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2804

48.   Caviston JP, Ross JL, Antony SM, Tokito M and Holzbaur EL. Huntingtin facilitate dynein/dynactin-mediated vesicle transport (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci 104: 10045-10050. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610628104

49.   Colin E, Zala D, Liot G, Rangone H, Borrell-Pages MJ, et al. Huntingtin phosphorylation acts as a molecular switch for anterograde/retrograde transport in neurons (2008) EMBO J 27: 2124-2134. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.133

50.   Ou CY, Poon VY, Maeder CI, Watanabe S, Lehrman EK, et al. Two cyclin-dependent kinase pathways are essential for polarized trafficking of presynaptic components (2010) Cell 141: 846-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.011

51.   Morfini G, Pigino G, Szebenyi G, You Y, Pollema S, et al. JNK mediates pathogenic effects of polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptor on fast axonal transport (2006) Nat Neurosci 9: 907-916. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1717

52.   Mark AM, Carly ID, Christopher MJ, Stephen HM, Rory JM, et al. RNA-directed activation of cytoplasmic dynein-1 in reconstituted transport RNPs (2018) eLife 7. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.36312.056

53.   Kendrick AA, Redwine WB, Tran PT, Vaites LP, Dzieciatkowska M, et al. (2019). Hook3 is a scaffold for the opposite-polarity microtubule-based motors cytoplasmic dynein-1 and KIF1C. J Cell Bio 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1101/508887

54.   Sanchez E, Liu X and Huse M. Actin clearance promotes polarized dynein accumulation at the immunological synapse (2019) plos one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210377

55.   Schroer TA, Steuer ER and Sheetz MP. Cytoplasmic dynein is a minus enddirected motor for membranous organelles (1989) Cell 56: 937-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90627-2

56.   Schnapp BJ and Reese TS. Dynein is the motor for retrograde axonal transport of organelles (1989) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 1548-1552. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.5.1548

57.   Chevalier-Larsen E and Holzbaur EL. Axonal transport and neurodegenerative disease (2006) Biochim Biophys Acta 1762: 1094-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.04.002

58.   Terasaki M. Recent progress on structural interactions of the endoplasmic reticulum (1990) Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 15: 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.970150203

59.   Allan V. Protein phosphatase 1 regulates the cytoplasmic dynein-driven formation of endoplasmic reticulum networks in vitro (1995) J Cell Biol 128: 879-891. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.128.5.879

60.   Corthesy-TI, Pauloin A and Pfeffer SR. Cytoplasmic dynein participates in the centrosomal localization of the Golgi complex (1992) J Cell Biol 118: 1333-1345. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.118.6.1333

61.   Ross JL, Ali MY and Warshaw DM. Cargo transport: molecular motors navigate a complex cytoskeleton (2008) Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.11.006

62.   Lin SX and Collins CA. Immunolocalization of cytoplasmic dynein to lysosomes in cultured cells (1992) J Cell Sci 101: 125-137.

63.   Aniento F, Emans N, Griffiths G and Gruenberg J. Cytoplasmic dynein dependent vesicular transport from early to late endosomes (1993) J Cell Biol 123: 1373-1387. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.123.6.1373

64.   Ravikumar B, Acevedo-Arozena A, Imarisio S, Berger Z, Vacher C, et al. Dynein mutations impair autophagic clearance of aggregate-prone proteins (2005) Nat Genet 37: 771-776. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1591

65.   Pfarr CM, Coue M, Grissom PM, Hays TS, Porter ME, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis (1990) Nature 345: 263-265. https://doi.org/10.1038/345263a0

66.   Hoogenraad CC, Akhmanova A, Howell SA, Dortland BR, De Zeeuw CI, et al. Mammalian Golgi-associated Bicaudal-D2 functions in the dynein–dynactin pathway by interacting with these complexes (2001) EMBO J 20: 4041-4054. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.15.4041

67.   Matanis T, Akhmanova A, Wulf P, Del NE, Weide T, et al. Bicaudal-D regulates COPI-independent Golgi-ER transport by recruiting the dynein-dynactin motor complex (2002) Nat Cell Biol 4, 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb891

68.   Gross SP, Welte MA, Block SM and Wieschaus EF. Dynein-mediated cargo transport in vivo. A switch controls travel distance (2000) J Cell Biol 148: 945-956. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.148.5.945

69.   Bostrom P, Andersson L, Rutberg M, Perman J, Lidberg U, et al. SNARE proteins mediate fusion between cytosolic lipid droplets and are implicated in insulin sensitivity (2007) Nat Cell Biol 9: 1286-1293. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1648

70.   Eschbach J, Fergani A, Oudart H, Robin JP, Rene F, et al. Mutations in cytoplasmic dynein lead to a Huntingtons disease-like defect in energy metabolism of brown and white adipose tissues (2011) Biochim Biophys Acta 1812: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.09.009

71.   Gonçalves JC, Dantas TJ and Vallee RB. Distinct roles for dynein light intermediate chains in neurogenesis, migration, and terminal somal translocation (2019) J Cell Biol 218: 808-819. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201806112

72.   Chapman DE, Reddy BJN, Huy B, Bovyn MJ, Cruz SJS, et al. Regulation of in vivo dynein force production by CDK5 and 14-3-3ε and KIAA0528 (2019) Nature Communications 10: 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08110-z

73.   Levy JR and Holzbaur EL. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin function and dysfunction in motor neurons (2006) Int J Dev Neurosci 24: 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2005.11.013

74.   Regehr WG, Carey MR and Best AR. Activity-dependent regulation of synapses by retrograde messengers (2009) Neuron 63: 154-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.021

75.   Cosker KE, Courchesne SL and Segal RA. Action in the axon: generation and transport of signaling endosomes (2008) Curr Opin Neurobiol 18: 270-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.005

76.   Yudin D, Hanz S, Yoo S, Iavnilovitch E, Willis D, et al. Localized regulation of axonal RanGTPase controls retrograde injury signaling in peripheral nerve (2008) Neuron 59: 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.029

77.   Rishal I and Fainzilber M. Retrograde signaling in axonal regeneration (2010) Exp Neurol 223: 5-10.

78.   Hirokawa N. Kinesin and dynein superfamily proteins and the mechanism of organelle transport (1998) Science 279: 519-526. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.519

79.   Satoh D, Sato D, Tsuyama T, Saito M, Ohkura H, et al. Spatial control of branching within dendritic arbors by dynein-dependent transport of Rab5-endosomes (2008) Nat Cell Biol 10:1164-1171. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1776

80.   Zheng Y, Wildonger J, Ye B, Zhang Y, Kita A, et al. Dynein is required for polarized dendritic transport and uniform microtubule orientation in axons (2008) Nat Cell Biol 10:1172-1180. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1777

81.   Braunstein KE, Eschbach J, Rona-Voros K, Soylu R, Mikrouli E, et al. A point mutation in the dynein heavy chain gene leads to striatal atrophy and compromises neurite outgrowth of striatal neurons (2010) Hum Mol Genet 19: 4385-4398 https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq361

82.   Wagner OI, Ascano J, Tokito M, Leterrier JF, Janmey PA, et al. The interaction of neurofifilaments with the microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein (2004) Mol Biol Cell 15: 5092-5100. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-05-0401

83.   Jahreiss L, Menzies FM and Rubinsztein DC. The itinerary of autophagosomes: from peripheral formation to kiss-and-run fusion with lysosomes (2008) Traffic 9: 574-587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00701.x

84.   Johansson M, Rocha N, Zwart W, Jordens I, Janssen L, et al. Activation of endosomal dynein motors by stepwise assembly of Rab7-RILP p150Glued, ORP1L, and the receptor betalll spectrin (2007) J Cell Biol 176: 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200606077

85.   Rocha N, Kuijl C, van der Kant R, Janssen L, Houben D, et al. Cholesterol sensor ORP1L contacts the ER protein VAP to control Rab7-RILP-p150 Glued and late endosome positioning (2009) J Cell Biol 185: 1209-1225. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200811005

86.   Kawaguchi Y, Kovacs JJ, McLaurin A, Vance JM, Ito A, et al. The deacetylase HDAC6 regulates aggresome formation and cell viability in response to misfolded protein stress (2003) Cell 115: 727-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00939-5

87.   Zhou X, Ikenoue T, Chen X, Li L, Inoki K, et al. Rheb controls misfolded protein metabolism by inhibiting aggresome formation and autophagy (2009) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 8923-8928. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903621106

88.   Zhang X, Lei K, Yuan X, Wu X, Zhuang Y, et al. SUN1/2 and Syne/ Nesprin-1/2 complexes connect centrosome to the nucleus during neurogenesis and neuronal migration in mice (2009) Neuron 64: 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.018

89.   Godin JD, Colombo K, Molina-Calavita M, Keryer G, Zala D, et al. Huntingtin is required for mitotic spindle orientation and mammalian neurogenesis (2010) Neuron 67: 392-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.027

90.   Bercier V, Hubbard JM, Fidelin K, Duroure K, Auer TO, et al. Dynactin1 depletion leads to neuromuscular synapse instability and functional abnormalities (2019) Molecular Neurodegeneration 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-019-0327-3

91.   Olczak M, Poniatowski L, Kwiatkowska M, Samojlowicz D, Tarka S, et al. Immunolocalization of dynein, dynactin, and kinesin in the cerebral tissue as a possible supplemental diagnostic tool for traumatic brain injury in postmortem examination (2019) Folia Neuropathol 57: 51-62. https://doi.org/10.5114/fn.2019.83831

92.   Berezuk MA and Schroer TA. Dynactin enhances the processivity of kinesin-2 (2007) Traffific 8: 124-129 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00517.x

93.   Splinter D, Tanenbaum ME, Lindqvist A, Jaarsma D, Flotho A, et al. Bicaudal D2, dynein, and kinesin-1 associate with nuclear pore complexes and regulate centrosome and nuclear positioning during mitotic entry (2010) PLoS Biol 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000350

94.   Zuccato C, Ciammola A, Rigamonti D, Leavitt BR, Goffredo D, et al. Loss of huntingtin-mediated BDNF gene transcription in Huntingtons disease (2001) Science 293: 493-498. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059581

95.   Cui L, Jeong H, Borovecki F, Parkhurst CN, Tanese N, et al, Transcriptional repression of PGC-1alpha by mutant huntingtin leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration (2006) Cell 127: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000350

96.   Lee SJ, Chae C and Wang MM. p150/glued modifies nuclear estrogen receptor function (2009) Mol Endocrinol 23: 620-629. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2007-0477

97.   Shrum CK, Defrancisco D and Meffert MK. Stimulated nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB and shuttling differentially depend on dynein and the dynactin complex (2009) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2647-2652. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806677106

98.   Dupuis L, Fergani A, Braunstein KE, Eschbach J, Holl N, et al. Mice with a mutation in the dynein heavy chain 1 gene display sensory neuropathy but lack motor neuron disease (2009) Exp Neurol 215: 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.019

99.   Matthew G Marzo, Jacqueline M Griswold, Kristina M Ruff, Rachel E Buchmeier, Colby P Fees, et al. Molecular basis for dyneinopathies reveals insight into dynein regulation and dysfunction. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47246

*Corresponding author  

Rajib dutta, MD, Consultant Neurology, China, Email: rajibdutta808@gmail.com

Citation

Dutta R and Sarkar RS. Role of dynein and dynactin (dctn-1) in neurodegenerative diseases (2019) Neurophysio and Rehab 2: 53-58.

Keywords

Dynein, Dynactin, DCTN1, Neurodegeneration.