Introduction

Excessive Gingival Display (EGD) can be considered one of the main concerns for patients regarding esthetics and its etiology has to be identified in order to define the ideal treatment plan. The gummy smile has been defined as a smile showing more than 1.5-2 mm of the gingiva and affects 7% of men and 14% of women world-wide [1]. Etiology varies, including gingival enlargement, Altered Passive Eruption (APE), vertical maxillary excess, anterior dentoalveolar extrusion, short upper lip, hyperactive upper lip, or a combination of the before mentioned factors [2].

In altered passive eruption, the Free Gingival Margin (FGM) is located more incisally or coronally over the enamel, resulting in short clinical crown length. The excessive gingival coverage of the anatomical crown is caused by retardation of the passive eruption phase of tooth eruption [3].

The distinguishing feature of Type 1 is a wide band of keratinized attached gingiva with an apical location of the mucogingival junction in relation to the alveolar crest. In subtype 1A, the distance from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) to the bone crest is within the norm of 1.5-2mm, while in subtype 1B the CEJ is almost coincident with the alveolar crest [4]. In Type 2, the keratinized gingiva is narrower and the mucogingival junction closer to the CEJ, which could be attributed to a failure of active or passive eruption. Type 1B is the most commonly encountered, and has been termed altered active eruption, which is a failure in the active eruption phase [4].

Crown lengthening is a periodontal procedure used to expose the tooth structure for the purpose of reestablishing the appropriate supracrestal tissue attachment space [5]. The most recent development in digital production of surgical guides is based on the superimposition of Cone Bean Computed Tomography (CBCT) data and intra-oral scanning data. These guides are designed and fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology with the use of printing or milling devices. These novel approaches improve positioning and accuracy of the surgical procedures [6].

Clinical Report

The patient presented to a private dental clinic for a crown lengthening procedure to treat her excessive gingival display from tooth 1.3 to 2.3 (Figure 1). Her diagnoses of gingival excess was established after the following examinations; periodontal probing, periapical radiographs, phenotype evaluation, cone-beam computed tomography scan for precise assessment of the osseous crest and its relation with the CEJ, for this purpose, radiographic markers were placed on each clinical crown and intraoral scans to obtain digital impressions of the maxilla, mandible and their occlusal relation for guide processing (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Preoperative photograph.

Figure 2: 2A) CBCT initial exam 2B) 3D scanned diagnostic model.

The guide was fabricated using a 3-D printer through the polymerization of an ultraviolet- sensitive liquid resin and was designed defining the desired gingival margin and osseous crest position according to the registration of the digitalized models onto the CBCT scans. Using reference points CEJ to the crest leaving a 3mm distance between these two reference points (Figure 3). Surgical guide was fabricated using BlueSkyBio and Meshmixer software. An hour prior to surgery, the patient was prescribed a dose of 875mg of amoxicillin and 125mg of clavulanate acid as a prophylactic antibiotic. Patient was also instructed to rinse for 1 minute using oral chlorhexidine 0.12% to minimize oral bacterial load. Local anesthesia was administered with 4% articaine with adrenaline 1:100,000 to anesthetize the infraorbitary and nasopalatine nerves as well as local infiltration.

The tooth supported 3D printed surgical stent was delivered to verify adjustment and stability. And an internal bevel incision according to the gingivectomy guide was designed and followed Intrasulcular incisions at the papilla area and in the buccal aspect with the subsequent removal of the collar tissue (Figure 4). A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated on the buccal side to access the alveolar bone crest without compromising the papilla from 1.3 to 2.3. The osteotomy was performed to reposition the buccal crest 3mm apically from the CEJ, using a low speed bur #701 with copious irtigation using abundant saline solution. Evaluation of every tooth was assessed to assure 3mm of supracrestal attachment space using a dental probe. The flap was repositioned apically and suspensory continuous suture was placed (Figure 5).

The patient was evaluated for suture removal 14 days after the surgery (Figure 6) and follow-up examinations were performed at 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 months and 1-year recall. Oral hygiene instructions and plaque removal were performed at each visit accordingly. Post surgical measures included ibuprofen 600mg every 8 hours for 7 days, 875mg of amoxicillin and 125mg of clavulanate acid for 7 days, chlorhexidine mouth rinse 0.12% 3 times a day for 21 days. Patient was recommended to avoid brushing and rinsing during the first 24 hours, only consume soft foods for 1 week and avoid oral hygiene in the treated areas for 7 days. 1 year after surgery we can observe the stability, maturity and health of the periodontal tissues (Figure 7).

Figure 3: 3D printed model, surgical guide and CT measurements.