The human body is host to trillions of microorganisms, including bacteria, molds, yeasts, viruses and archaea. In addition, the contribution of the microbiome to human health has become thoroughly established with roles such as educating the immune response, resisting pathogens, and digestion. As a result, the human microbiome project was designed to ascertain the microbial composition of the entire human body. Meanwhile, the oral microbiome has been extensively determined and reported in the literature. The current reported microbiome of the oral cavity region contains 619 taxa, derived from 13 phyla [1-4].
An additional 36,043 gene clones have been sequenced, identifying an additional 434 unique oral taxa that (after further validation) may be added to the database. Amongst the oral strains sequenced to date, two important gluten metabolizing species, Rothia mucilaginosa and Rothia aeria have been identified [4,5]. R. mucilaginosa and R. aeria are of the Rothia genus under the phyla Actinobacteria. R. aeria was named after its isolation from air in the Russian space laboratory Mir and is an oral inhabitant [6,7].
R. mucilaginosa is primarily found in the oral cavity but has been reported in the upper respiratory tract and also the duodenum [8-11]. Interestingly, mucosal damage in celiac disease is mostly found in this area of the gastro-intestinal system . Oral micro-organisms that in vitro degrade dietary proteins may mean that they play an in vivo role in food metabolism. During mastication, ingested food is mixed with stimulated whole saliva and oral micro-organisms. This process accelerates food digestion while the bolus is still churning in the oral cavity .
For example, nitrate reducing bacteria have been described as being indispensable in the production of nitric oxide which regulates blood pressure and cardiovascular health and this further emphasize the importance of the oral microbiome in systemic health [14-16]. A favorable and potential source for gluten-degrading enzymes would be the micro-organisms inhabiting the human gastro-intestinal tract. It is well reported that bacteria residing in and on the human body supply the host with numerous functions that are not encoded by the human genome . For instance, bacteria that colonize the large intestine ferment starches that are resistant to mammalian digestive enzymes .
In addition, it has been reported that human breast milk contains a number of oligosaccharides that are only digested by gut bacteria, not the breast-feeding child [19,20]. Therefore, recent publications that report gluten-degrading bacteria as natural residents of the oral cavity are not surprising after all [21,22]. This discovery is also very significant, since the oral cavity represents the gateway to the gastro-intestinal system in which gluten is mixed with the oral microorganisms in human saliva. The finding of gluten-degrading oral microbes then begs the questions, what are they susceptible to and what common source may reduce the gluten metabolizers or decrease their effectiveness of gluten processing, leading to gluten “sensitivity”?
The purpose of this study was to determine if there is any inhibition of beneficial oral biofilm species such as Rothia aeria, R. mucilaginosa and R. dentocariosa, Streptococcus mutans (pathogen-negative control) and also Lactobacillus reuteri strains (isolated from periobalance Probiotic) by Over The Counter (OTC) oral antimicrobials utilizing in vitro laboratory technique. The secondary objective was to determine the antagonism, if any, of the Rothia genus by Streptococcus species (mutans and salivarius) and known pathogens. Rothia aeria and R. mucilaginosa are reported to be important in the processing of gluten. Inhibition of these beneficial bacteria by OTC products, either directly or indirectly, would increase gluten sensitivity in patients. Beneficial bacteria may be indirectly inhibited by certain antagonistic bacteria that are relatively less sensitive to OTC products.
Three colonies of R. aeria,
R. dentocariosa, R. mucilaginosa, S. mutans,
or Lactobacillus were obtained from
isolation plates and grown in Mueller-Hinton media to a McFarland Standard of
0.5. Either Brucella
agar plates, Rogosa agar, or Mueller-Hinton agar plates with 5% sheep blood
were wholly spread to create a lawn with one cotton swab inoculation of chosen
target bacteria. Five cotton discs were evenly distributed on the plate and 10
microliters of full strength OTC reagent was pipetted directly onto each
corresponding disc. The plates were evaluated after 30 hours of growth at 36oC.
Calipers were used to measure zones of inhibition in millimeters.
Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) was autoclaved and cooled to 56 degrees and aliquots of 25 mL were cooled and inoculated with 2 mL of 0.5 McFarland Standard suspensions of target organisms: R. dentocariosa, R. mucilaginosa, Streptococcus salivarius, Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa prior to pouring agar plates. Impregnated plates were then inoculated in punched zones using a disposable 10 microliter loop with 0.5 McFarland Standards of test inhibiting bacteria species: Streptococcus salivarius, Staphylococcus aureus, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and R. dentocariosa or R. mucilaginosa. The plates were evaluated after 24 hours of growth at 36oC. Calipers were used to measure zones of inhibition.
Bacterial growths of all tested bacteria were inhibited by Crest ProHealth™, ACT™, Listerine SmartRinse™, and Chlorhexidine. R. aeria and R. mucilaginosa were also inhibited by Embrace™ varnish (Table 1).
Spry™ Xylitol Toothpaste Gel inhibited R. mucilaginosa. L. reuteri,
a probiotic that inhibits many oral and pathogens, was significantly inhibited
by OTC oral products, except the xylitol based. Xylitol based oral products did
not inhibit the commensal S.
salivarius nor the pathogens, S.
aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa (Table 2).
Xylitol based oral products do inhibit many oral pathogens and have been extensively used in dentistry for decades. Growth of P. aeruginosa was inhibited by R. dentocariosa and growth of S. aureus was inhibited by R. mucilaginosa. The zones of inhibition by the gluten metabolizers were demonstrably large. The inhibition of the beneficial gluten metabolizers and probiotic bacteria by OTC oral products may have been the result of fluoride concentration.
An alcohol based product, ListerineTM, did not
greatly inhibit the gluten metabolizers (Figure
In vitro results are not always applicable
to the clinical situation. Indeed, the complexity of the human oral microbiome
would make it difficult to predict a response to any oral intervention with
certainty. The results of the present study are of a pilot nature, a negative
finding would mean that there is little need for further investigation.
However, in vitro studies are always
necessary before progressing into more extensive, time consuming, and
financially demanding clinical studies. The mere fact that OTC products,
sometimes used ad libitum by patients, contribute to a reduction in beneficial
bacteria should be a concern to all health practitioners. Of greater interest
should be the extent of inhibition, as the zones of inhibition were quite
significant in diameter. The average
diameter of inhibition with an OTC product was 13 mm [Range: <6-18 mm] (Figure 2).
The mode of inhibition should be discovered, as it appears
that the fluoride concentration of the OTC products may have been contributory.
An alcohol based product was only inhibitory of the probiotic in this study,
and not the gluten metabolizers. With dental disease at an increasing rate in
developing countries due to the shift to a higher carbohydrate diet, with
addition of processed foods containing added sugars, health professionals
should be cautioning about the over use of OTC
products. The dental caries rate is not decreasing, as would be expected
with all the OTC utilization, and dental expenditures are increasing every year. Perhaps the OTC products help with
limiting the pathogenic bacteria but only at the expense of also eliminating
many beneficial bacteria. This is a no win situation for the population,
spending vital resources on products that may indeed create more pathology,
such as, gluten sensitivity, and fail to protect from dental caries. The beneficial effect of fluoride for caries protection may
be somewhat decreased by the possible inhibition of oral probiotic bacteria by
over use of OTC products. Unsupervised use of a daily fluoride mouth rinse by a
child could possibly create a gluten sensitivity issue, and due to lack of
regulatory oversight, this severe side effect would never be discovered (Table 3).
Another very important aspect of this study was the interaction between pathogenic and beneficial bacteria. The interaction, or rather, the inhibition of different bacterial species actually determines the health of the host and as such, is paramount in importance. The results were significant in that growth of Rothia species was inhibited by other bacteria. This suggests that if the oral flora equilibrium is changed by using OTC oral hygiene products, a domino effect can change the entire oral microbiome, which is the gateway to the digestive tract. The gastric microbiome is now recognized as a vital component of the host’s health, both mental and physical. Increased oversight concerning the over uses of anti-microbial, food preservatives that are also anti-microbial, and OTC products that inhibit commensal bacteria, is essential. Required testing of OTC products and better population education into the importance of the holobiome should be a health priority. The connection between the increase in chronic diseases and the significant shift reported in the modern human microbiome should be further investigated.
ConclusionRothia and Lactobacillus species may be decreased in quantity by the overuse of oral antimicrobials. OTC products may alter the oral microbiome creating a situation less conducive for the survival of essential beneficial bacteria. The use of OTC products may decrease the enzymatic degradation of gluten containing foods by Rothia bacteria. This can possibly result in gluten sensitivity, thereby increasing the clinical prevalence of celiac disease. Further studies are required before any clinical implications may be concluded, but oral antimicrobials should be used only when necessary.
- Camp JG, Kanther M, Semova I and Rawls JF. Patterns and scales in gastrointestinal microbial ecology (2009) Gastroenterol 136: 1989-2002. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.075
- Ley RE, Peterson DA and Gordon JI. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine (2006) Cell 124: 837-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017
- Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, et al. The human microbiome project (2007) Nature 449: 804-810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06244
- Chen T, Yu WH, Izard J, Baranova OV, Lakshmanan A, et al. The Human Oral Microbiome Database: a web accessible resource for investigating oral microbe taxonomic and genomic information (2010) Database (Oxford) 2010: baq013. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baq013
- Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, et al. The human oral microbiome (2010) J Bacteriol 192: 5002-5017. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00542-10
- Wei G, Zamkhcharfi M, Dewhirst F, Schuppan D, Oppenheim F, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Gluten Degrading Bacteria From the Oral Cavity (2011) Gasteroenterol 140: S-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(11)62656-5
- Li Y, Kawamura Y, Fujiwara N, Naka T, Liu H, et al. Rothia aeria sp. nov., Rhodococcus baikonurensis sp. nov. and Arthrobacter russicus sp. nov., isolated from air in the Russian space laboratory MiR (2004) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 827-835. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02828-0
- Kazor CE, Mitchell PM, Lee AM, Stokes LN, Loesche WJ, et al. Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients (2003) J Clin Microbiol 41: 558-563. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.2.558-563.2003
- Collins MD, Hutson RA, Baverud V and Falsen E. Characterization of a Rothia-like organism from a mouse: description of Rothia nasimurium sp. nov. and reclassification of Stomatococcus mucilaginosus as Rothia mucilaginosa comb. Nov (2000) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 Pt 3: 1247-1251. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-3-1247
- Zaura E, Keijser BJ, Huse SM and Crielaard W. Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities (2009) BMC Microbiol 9: 259. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-259
- Ou G, Hedberg M, Horstedt P, Baranov V, Forsberg G, et al. Proximal small intestinal microbiota and identification of rod-shaped bacteria associated with childhood celiac disease (2009) Am J Gastroenterol 104: 3058-3067. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.524
- Bonamico M, Mariani P, Thanasi E, Ferri M, Nenna R, et al. Patchy villous atrophy of the duodenum in childhood celiac disease (2004) J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 38: 204-207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200402000-00019
- Kodukula K, Faller DV, Harpp DN, Kanara I, Pernokas J, et al. Gut microbiota and salivary diagnostics: The mouth is salivating to tell us something (2017) BioRes open access 6: 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2017.0020
- Hyde ER, Andrade F, Vaksman Z, Parthasarathy K, Jiang H, et al. Metagenomic analysis of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the oral cavity: implications for nitric oxide homeostasis (2014) PloS one 9: e88645. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088645
- Koopman JE, Buijs MJ, Brandt BW, Keijser BJ, Crielaard W, et al. Nitrate and the origin of saliva influence composition and short chain fatty acid production of oral microcosms (2016) Microbial Ecol 72: 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0775-z
- Kapil V, Haydar SM, Pearl V, Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, et al. Physiological role for nitrate-reducing oral bacteria in blood pressure control (2013) Free Radical Biol Med 55: 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.11.013
- Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome (2006) Science 312: 1355-1359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124234
- Hooper LV, Midtvedt T and Gordon JI. How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine (2002) Annu Rev Nutr 22: 283-307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.011602.092259
- Kirmiz N, Robinson RC, Shah IM, Barile D and Mills DA. Milk glycans and their interaction with the infant-gut microbiota (2018) Annu Rev Food Sci Techno l9: 429-450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-030216-030207
- Moossavi S, Atakora F, Miliku K, Sepehri S, Robertson B, et al. Integrated analysis of human milk microbiota with oligosaccharides and fatty acids in the CHILD cohort (2019) Frontiers Nutri 6: 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00058
- Helmerhorst EJ, Zamakhchari M, Schuppan D and Oppenheim FG. Discovery of a novel and rich source of gluten-degrading microbial enzymes in the oral cavity (2010) PLoS One 5: e13264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013264
N, Faller L, Leffler DA, Kelly CP, Hansen J, et al. Salivary gluten degradation
and oral microbial profiles in healthy individuals and celiac disease patients
(2017) App Environ Microbial 83: e03330-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03330-16
Mark L Cannon, Professor, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA, Tel: 847-899-6720, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
CitationMark LC, Kabat B, Yogev R, Jantra L, Awan A, et al. Inhibition of rothia species by over-the-counter products and bacterial antagonists (2020) Edelweiss Appli Sci4: 5-8.
Gluten oral bacteria, Rothia mucilaginosa and