Case Report
38 years old male without any medical problems presented to the office first time for routine medical checkup. During history and examination, he told me he is having infertility for last 2 years all the workup has been negative except low sperm count.
On my clinical examination his right testicular sensation was missing and he never had any testicular ultrasound. There were no signs of any gynecomastia, loss of axillary or pubic hair. I decided to do the workup including ultrasound testes and hormone panel and that showed decreased FSH decrease LH and testosterone level surprisingly was normal 6 months before. Ultrasound testes he showed right testicular neoplasm patient was sent to urologist for further management he had a right inguinal orchiectomy done. Patient had a CT scan of chest abdomen and pelvis no evidence of any med stasis. After 3 months of surgery patients testosterone level improved and other hormone level normalized and sperm count improved.
Component
The right testicle measures 3.3 x 1.6 x 2.1 cm. There are 2 discrete intraparenchymal right testicular masses identified. The largest is seen at the inferior medial aspect of the testicle, measuring 1.4 x 1.0 x 1.3 cm, solid and with marked vascularity. There are prominent hyperechoic foci seen at the periphery of the lesion, most likely calcification. Within the posterior mid aspect of the testicle, there is an additional hypoechoic solid lesion that also contains internal vascularity, measuring 0.9 x 0.7 x 0.9 cm. The findings are most consistent with a multifocal right testicular neoplasm. There is mild degree right testicular microlithiasis. The right epididymal head appears within normal limits.
The left testicle measures 3.7 x 1.7 x 2.2 cm, unremarkable.
CT pelvis: There is a moderate amount of fecal material seen within the rectosigmoid colon. The prostate gland appears unremarkable. The urinary bladder is unremarkable. There are normal size inguinal lymph nodes. There is no discrete adenopathy seen. There is no ascites. The appendix appears unremarkable.
Table: Lab test and imaging studies.
Impression
1. There is no adenopathy seen.
2. There is a moderate amount of fecal maternal seen in the rectosigmoid colon.
Discussion
Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy affecting males between the ages of 15 and 35, although it accounts for only 1 percent of all cancers in men [1]. Germ cell tumors (GCTs) account for 95 percent of testicular cancers . They may consist of one predominant histologic pattern or represent a mix of multiple histologic types. For treatment purposes, two broad categories of testis tumors are recognized: pure seminoma (no nonseminomatous elements present) and all others, which together are termed nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). In most series, the ratio of seminoma to NSGCT is approximately one.
Testicular cancer has become one of the most curable of solid neoplasms because of remarkable treatment advances beginning in the late 1970s. Prior to that time, testicular cancer accounted for 11 percent of all cancer deaths in men between the ages of 25 and 34, and the five-year survival rate was 64 percent [2]. In 2017, approximately 400 deaths from testicular cancer are expected in the United States, with a five-year survival rate of over 95 percent [1].
Testicular tumors usually present as a nodule or painless swelling of one testicle, which may be noted incidentally by the patient or by his sexual partner [3].
Occasionally, a man with a previously small atrophic testis will note enlargement. Approximately 30 to 40 percent of patients complain of a dull ache or heavy sensation in the lower abdomen, perianal area, or scrotum, while acute pain is the presenting symptom in 10 percent.
In any man with a solid, firm mass within the testis, testicular cancer must be the considered diagnosis until proven otherwise. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer provides the best opportunity for cure. Nevertheless, both patient and clinician factors often contribute to a delay in diagnosis.
The widespread use of scrotal ultrasound in the evaluation of male infertility occasionally leads to the diagnosis of an incidental nonpalpable testicular mass [4,5].
Conclusion
In male infertility, physical examination is key and ultrasound of testes should be a routine part of workup.
References
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018 (2018) CA Cancer J Clin 68: 7. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
2. Einhorn LH. Treatment of testicular cancer: a new and improved model (1990) J Clin Oncol 8: 1777. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1990.8.11.1777
3. Bosl GJ and Motzer RJ. Testicular germ-cell cancer (1997) N Engl J Med 337: 242. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199707243370406
4. Toren PJ, Roberts M, Lecker I, Grober ED, Jarvi K, et al. Small incidentally discovered testicular masses in infertile men--is active surveillance the new standard of care? (2010) J Urol 183: 1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.012
5. Eifler JB Jr, King P and Schlegel PN. Incidental testicular lesions found during infertility evaluation are usually benign and may be managed conservatively (2008) J Urol 180: 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.021
*Corresponding author:
Manoj Singla, Reading Hospital and Medical Center, Pennsylvania, USA
Citation:
Singla M. Unique 38 Years Old Male Presenting with Male Infertility Found to Have Seminoma Testes: A Rare Case Report (2018) Edelweiss Appli Sci Tech 2: 234-235
Keywords
Male infertility, Testicular tumor, Seminoma